The way out begins with a question
Free your mind, and the rest will follow.
Journalist Sara Carter posted a photograph taken at President Biden’s speech in Philadelphia on 2 September 2022 and posed a provocative question on Twitter -“What’s the first thing to come to mind when you see this photo?”
While there are a myriad of possible answers, for me the answer is very simple: the Lil Nas X video for the song “Montero (Call me by your name).” The song debuted as a “number 1 hit” on Billboard’s Hot 100 chart in April 2021 and is still commonly heard on pop radio in the US and elsewhere. For those unfamiliar with the controversial video, it can be characterized as a source of political and cultural provocation. Here, an article by the Guardian discusses the reaction:
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2021/mar/30/lil-nas-x-montero-call-me-by-your-name-twitter
From a conservative media standpoint, Gateway Pundit offers a good primer.
One specific portion of the Gateway Pundit article refers to Roblox:
“In January, NPR reported in an article titled ‘Lil Nas X Says Children Are His Core Audience and That’s OK.’ ‘Reaching kids on their level has been a big part of the public persona of Lil Nas X in the past year. Last spring he did a virtual performance on the Not-Too-Late Show, singing the theme along with its host Elmo (the Sesame Street puppet). Leading into the holidays, he did a virtual performance on the online video game platform Roblox, reminiscent of the Travis Scott Fortnite concert in April. But Roblox has a huge younger audience, and the Lil Nas X concert alone drew in over 30 million visits.”
As the article suggests, Roblox is an online gaming and social media platform, which has carved a niche with younger audiences. More than half its users are under 12 years of age.
(source: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1190869/roblox-games-users-global-distribution-age/ )
As it happens, David Baszucki, founder and CEO of Roblox, was the primary sponsor for an important trial of the drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) led by principal investigator Dr. David Boulware of the University of Minnesota. The study is a major reason why the use of HCQ was- and still is- denied for those infected with Covid-19, despite several studies showing HCQ is effective in preventing severe outcomes when given early to treat Covid-19. HCQ also has an excellent safety profile, proven over decades, and it is still prescribed routinely to treat other ailments, such as Lyme Disease. The funding sources for the study are listed by the University of Minnesota here, with Baszucki given top billing:
https://covidpep.umn.edu/support
Context for the study may be gathered from an interview of Yale Professor of Epidemiology Dr. Harvey Risch, conducted by Mark Levin and aired on Fox News on 23 August 2020. Interestingly, their discussion identified the very University of Minnesota study funded by Roblox founder David Baszucki as an outlier. Levin cited virologist Steve Hatfill, who grouped the study with the infamous retracted Lancet-gate paper- in which the mysterious company Surgisphere faked worldwide hospital data. Risch agreed the evidence for the HCQ effectiveness was overwhelming and described the situation regarding HCQ as a massive disinformation campaign:
Levin (interviewer): “Steve Hatfill is a veteran virologist, and he recently wrote, ‘There are now 53 studies that show positive results of HCQ in COVID infections. There are 14 global studies that show neutral or negative results – and 10 of them were of patients in very late stages of COVID-19, where no antiviral drug can be expected to have much effect. Of the remaining four studies, two come from the same University of Minnesota author. The other two are from the faulty Brazil paper, which should be retracted, and the fake Lancet paper, which was. What is going on here? This is very bizarre…’
Dr. Harvey Risch: I conclude the evidence is overwhelming… (HCQ) has a very substantial benefit reducing risk of hospitalization or mortality, and there has been a massive disinformation campaign that stretches from the government to the media that’s either suppressing this message or countering it with a false message. And I’m not an expert in the reasons why that is happening other than just observing it. But I am an expert in the science, and I can tell you the science is all one-sided. In fact, the science is so one-sided in supporting this result, that it is stronger than anything else I have ever studied in my entire career. The evidence in favor of HCQ benefit in high-risk patients treated early, as outpatients, is stronger than anything else I have ever studied. So scientifically, there is no question whatsoever.”
The influence of the so-called Boulware trial, funded primarily by Roblox founder David Baszucki, was profound. One of the two University of Minnesota papers referenced in the Levin-Risch interview is described in the literature as Skipper et al. That article was described by author Norman Doidge in his excellent overview of the controversy surrounding HCQ as follows:
“It is one thing for the HCQ skeptics to have challenged the studies that said it worked, saying they were imperfect and flawed because they were not Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). But what they really needed in order to put the molecule (HCQ) out of its misery once and for all were some top notch RCTs to show it didn’t work. That would finish the job. And that is what happened next. Official opinions began to morph from, ‘let’s wait for the RCTs to settle the matter,’ to ‘it’s already been settled by the RCTs.’ ”
“When an RCT by Skipper and colleagues was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, it came with an editorial accompanying, claiming that this study, along with a few others, were now ‘strong evidence’ against HCQ being more effective than placebo in mild COVID-19 patients. The editorial then argued that the ‘sad saga’ of HCQ had almost come to an end. But, then, ‘almost at an end’ wasn’t soon enough, because the editorial concluded, ‘It is time to move on from hydroxychloroquine.’ ”
(From https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/hydroxychloroquine-morality-tale by Norman Doidge.)
So it is nearly impossible to overstate the role of the Baszucki-supported study as a catalyst for preventing the use of HCQ to treat Covid-19. With HCQ dismissed as an option for preventing hospitalizations and death, lockdowns were enforced for a much longer period of time.
One major beneficiary of the lockdowns was… David Baszucki himself. Roblox experienced rapid growth in 2020 because, according to Capitalist Today article, which cited Reuters: “Usage and spending on Roblox has surged as kids stuck at home in the COVID-19 pandemic spent more time on the platform, fueling an 85% year-on-year jump in daily active users and 2020 and a surge in monthly in-app sales.”
The same article also states that:
“Shares of Roblox Corp jumped on Thursday (11 March 2021), building on the gaming platform’s almost 55% rise on its stock market debut a day earlier… (founder and CEO David) Baszucki joined the tech billionaire’s club after the site was valued at nearly $30 billion in a funding deal late last year. His stake was valued at $4.58 billion on Wednesday (10 March 2021), according to Reuters calculations.”
But David Baszucki was not the only person to benefit from Roblox’s stock increase attributable to the lockdown of children. It turns out that the family of Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, was given access to purchase Roblox stock at its initial public offering. “As you can see, the Pelosi’s purchased 10,000 shares of Roblox paying between $500,000-$1,000,000 on the day RBLX launched its shares on the NYSE.”
https://equity.guru/2021/04/14/roblox-rblx-stock-to-the-moon
The stock increased by 55% on the first day of its issue.
Speaker Pelosi was a staunch supporter of lockdowns only months prior to the Roblox IPO. In a CNN interview on 14 July 2020, Jim Sciutto asked Pelosi, “…do you believe that states now experiencing these spikes (in Covid infections) need to shut down again?”
Pelosi replied, “…I do think we should look to our – our friends in other countries. When they had a serious lockdown – serious lockdown, 90-some percent lockdown- they won the fight against the virus… It is a recognition that unless you have a very, very low percentage of incidence of the infection, you really have to consider locking down.”
Ref: https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/71420
The lockdowns supported by Speaker Pelosi led directly to billions of dollars in profits for Roblox CEO David Baszucki. In turn, the Pelosi family was given access to the Roblox IPO stock offering which increased 55% on its first day of trading, resulting in large profits for the Pelosi family.
Thus, it is nothing more than a straightforward summary of factual observations that:
1) Roblox’s CEO funded an influential study of early treatment for Covid-19, which concluded that hydrochloroquine was “not proven effective” for treating Covid-19.
2) Because the authors of the influential study did not conclude that a benefit was present, strict lockdown measures were enforced. Moreover, an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) was issued for other products, which ultimately included vaccines.
3) Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi was in a position to promote and legislate lockdowns, which prevented children from playing with each other outdoors and instead drove them toward using the Roblox online gaming platform and social media outlet.
4) The Roblox CEO, David Baszucki, made billions of dollars, according to news reports, because children were locked down.
5) The Pelosi family were granted access to Roblox stock at its initial public offering and likely acquired millions of dollars when Roblox increased by 55% on its first day.
***
I believe the above story demonstrates a failure of objective journalism in the United States. Each item I reference is readily available simply via internet access. Yet not one media outlet has so far pursued it.
Now we must consider what may happen next. In December 2021, Baszucki funded and promoted a $6 million study of “chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy for lymphoma patients” to be carried out at the University of California at San Francisco.
While the article summarizes one apparent success, it does include the parenthetical statement:
“Not all CAR T patients have the same experience; some patients may experience short- or long-term side effects, including cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity.”
In fact, one recent publication (Gust et al., “GFAP and NfL increase during neurotoxicity from high baseline levels in pediatric CD19-CAR T-cell patients,” 2022) in the medical journal Blood Advances states the following:
“Neurotoxicity remains a common but incompletely understood adverse event in cancer immunotherapy. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for hematologic malignancies poses a particularly high risk of neurologic toxicity, affecting 30-60% of patients. The most common manifestation of immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a delirium-like encephalopathic state that is often accompanied by language dysfunction. This can progress to altered level of alertness, and in severe cases, seizures and coma. Rarely, patients develop rapidly progressive global cerebral edema which can be fatal.”
If this refereed journal publication is accurate, approximately half of all CAR T treated patients will experience some form of neurologic toxicity. Despite this high risk of a serious adverse event, less than a month ago, on 5 August 2022, Roche Pharmaceuticals invested $110 million dollars into CAR T therapy through the purchase of Poseida Therapeutics.
***
What is the likelihood that CAR T therapy is destined to be the next politically connected, Big-Pharma-funded media darling? The odds are looking pretty good. But - buyer beware. Political connections are often a poor predictor of drug (or other medical product) effectiveness.
The saga of Theranos provides a useful example. As recently as 2015, Theranos boasted corporate board members including former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger, former CDC Director William Foege, former secretary of state George Shultz, and former Secretary of Defense James Mattis. But as insider.com reports:
“In July 2015, the Food and Drug Administration approved one of the company's blood tests, leading to a party at headquarters and excitement about the company's future. But in October, questions started being raised about how the company's technology worked, prompted by investigative stories from The Wall Street Journal reporter John Carreyrou. The company had begun its long fall from grace.”
( https://www.insider.com/theranos-former-board-members-henry-kissinger-george-shultz-james-mattis-2019-3 which references a 2015 article which is the source of the inset below: https://www.businessinsider.com/theranos-board-of-directors-2015-10 )
It took nearly seven years from the time of the initial investigations for a fraud conviction against disgraced former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes to be issued in court in January 2022. Her appeal process is ongoing, as described by CNBC.
“Nearly a decade ago, (Elizabeth) Holmes raised $945 million from high-profile investors including the family of former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, Rupert Murdoch and the Walton family of Walmart fame. To lure investors, witnesses testified that Holmes’ claims about the company’s blood-testing technology were either exaggerated or false. In the end, jurors convicted Holmes of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. She faces up to 20 years in prison.”
The experience with Theranos demonstrates how easy it was to deceive well-known and respected leaders with the illusion of a medical miracle. They all attached their names to a company, Theranos, which sold a product equivalent to snake oil.
***
The emergence of a possible cancer-fighting CAR T therapy has emerged after reports, based on CDC numbers, of a mysterious rapid increase in cancer rates in 2021 and 2022. Using prior years’ data, the science blogger and journalist known as “The Ethical Skeptic” has published data showing Cancer and lymphomas, at level of 9 standard deviations above the average value.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/tag/cancer
The mRNA Covid gene therapy “vaccine” is a prime suspect for this reported increase. Coincidentally, perhaps, the Biden Administration announced a “War on Cancer” on 2 February 2022.
If T cells are indeed damaged by the Covid “vaccines,” the number of cancer cases throughout the US and the rest of the world which bought into the mRNA products are likely to rise, and the global market for CAR T therapy might likewise increase. Such a development may justify the investment by Roche and also boost the fortunes of other biotech companies, like Editas Medicine, which is infamously linked to the late convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
To place the grant to UCSF into context, consider that Roblox CEO Baszucki recently sold 766,000 shares of Roblox. If it were priced at $50 per share (referenced elsewhere on the article), the sale would be worth about $40 million dollars.
https://investorplace.com/2022/08/ceo-david-baszucki-just-sold-roblox-rblx-stock-heres-why/
Logic suggests that Baszucki is heavily invested in those biotech stocks which he supports through charitable grants. Such an approach would fit the model used by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BGMF). The potential for rampant abuse of the model, is described in astonishing detail by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in his book, The Real Doctor Fauci, which is a must-read for anyone interested in the background to the Covid-19 pandemic and its consequences.
I ask readers to pay very close attention to the President Biden’s forthcoming speech about his administration’s “War on Cancer” planned for 12 September 2022. Will the promise of CAR T therapy be one of the topics discussed by the president? If so, then you might reflect that David Baszucki may be influencing the actions of the Biden Administration.
(I will refrain from any further edits once I update this post on 11 September 2022- one day prior to his planned speech.)
***
The popular singer known as Lil Nas X was born Montero Lamar Hill. In December 2018, when he was only 20 years old, the song Old Town Road became popular via the China-based phone app, TikTok. The song was re-released in March 2019, with the assistance of Billy Ray Cyrus, and went to #1 for a record 19 straight weeks.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Town_Road
The music industry promoted Lil Nas X as a country music artist, and the song was promoted on country radio stations. Perhaps because of its simple lyrics and success on TikTok, the song became especially well-liked by children in the US.
Shortly after the song’s long run at number 1, an announcement appeared on the Twitter account of Lil Nas X stating he is gay (on 30 June 2019).
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/old-town-road-rapper-lil-nas-x-appears-come-out-n1025216
Although there have been notable exceptions, such as K.D. Lang with her hit song Constant Craving in the 1990’s, it has historically been unusual for openly gay or lesbian artists to succeed in the country music industry. And to be fair, K.D. Lang’s music was boycotted by some country radio stations in the 90’s once her sexual orientation was revealed.
The song Old Town Road, and Lil Nas X, went on to win a Country Music Association (CMA) award in November 2019.
In 2020, Lil Nas X underwent a transformation from country artist to pop singer. His appeal to children was, perhaps, a factor in forming a unique partnership with Roblox to promote his new music. In November of 2020, he performed the “virtual concert” on Roblox, which was described at the beginning of this article.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lil_Nas_X
Per wikipedia, the next part speaks for itself:
“On March 29, 2021, Lil Nas X partnered with New York-based art collective MSCHF to release a modified pair of Nike Air Max 97s called Satan Shoes, which may be seen on Satan's feet in the music video used to promote the release of ‘Montero (Call Me by Your Name)’.[98][99] The shoes are black and red with a bronze pentagram, filled with ‘60cc and 1 drop of human blood’. Only 666 pairs were made at a price of $1,018. Nike said they were uninvolved in the creation and promotion of the shoes and did not endorse the messages of Lil Nas X or MSCHF.”
The mere four-month separation between the Roblox concert and that announcement strongly suggests that individuals associated with Roblox either helped to create the video or- at a minimum- were aware of the video content during its development.
Details of the video are described here by the liberal news outlet Vox:
“The ‘Montero’ music video, with its decadent queer eroticism, spurred an initial homophobic backlash as conservative viewers chided Lil Nas X for supposedly corrupting children. But if the video drew a wave of backlash, the video plus the Satan shoes drew a veritable tsunami… The resultant controversy has spawned a series of endlessly entertaining moments — cascading dominos of devilish diversion, starting with the enjoyably campy video that began all of this hysteria.”
The conservative publication, Vigilant Citizen, described the details much differently.
“Through biblical references and overt symbolism, MONTERO becomes a celebration of Satanism disguised as a ‘queer song’. The Greek words of the tree form a quote taken from Plato’s Symposium. It says:
‘After the division the two parts of man, each desiring his other half.’
To better understand this quote, we must look at the general context of the Symposium. In this philosophical text, several men attend a banquet (where wine is flowing freely) and participate in a contest of speeches to praise Eros, the god of love and desire.
Strangely enough, one of the speeches praises ‘boy love’.
Pausanias contrasts common desire with a ‘heavenly’ love between an older man and a young man (before the age when his beard starts to grow), in which the two exchange sexual pleasure while the older man imparts wisdom to the younger one.
– Wikipedia, Symposium
After being possessed by Lucifer, LNX finds himself on Earth and he’s being judged with severity….Then, Lil Nas X literally grinds on Satan for an uncomfortable number of seconds. ”
Perhaps understandably, Vigilant Citizen does not describe the “grinding scene” in much detail. However, to fully comprehend the similarity between the speech and the scene, it is necessary to examine those very details.
***
Let us begin by considering the still pictures of the two scenes below. The image on the left is the one described by journalist Sara Carter when posing her question. The image on the right is taken from “the grinding scene.” The lighting and overall theme of the Biden speech and the grinding scene from Montero are similar. The two still shots share commonality in much of the peripheral imagery. In Biden’s speech, two US Marines flank each side. In the Montero video, rather than two US Marines, two skulls serve as de facto sentinels. Long vertical red/orange alternate with black. (Note that the minor differences in red versus orange hues can be influenced by color filters.)
Considering the proportions of the images, one can see that Lil Nas X’s head is nearly circularly framed, resembling the Presidential seal on the lectern used by President Biden in both shape and proximal location. Biden face is positioned approximately in line with the head of Satan. The scene positions Satan near the bottom of the frame, emphasizing the depths of Hell. Biden was photographable in the same fashion. (Do not shoot the messenger - I did not craft the video nor did I choreograph Biden’s speech or its background.)
I should mention that prior to making a visual connection of the still shots above, I had never watched the “grinding scene” in the “Montero (Call me by your name)” video in its entirety. So my initial contemplation of the similarities between the imagery of Biden’s speech and Montero was whimsical. You might say, “I was playing in the beginning.”
Then I watched the grinding scene – “and the mood all changed”:
1) One of the interesting and perhaps unexpected aspects, of the Montero video is that Satan is depicted as a passive entity- like a zombie. Lil Nas X is positioned at his ear, in a position to tell him what actions to take. Then, Lil Nas X blocks Satan from view with his body. Rather than appearing powerful and actively evil, Satan is dressed like a captive and resembles a slave. The video suggests that Lil Nas X provides Satan with sexual pleasure. Satan is portrayed as weak, mute, and immobilized, moving only slightly when suggesting the expression of sexual gratification.
2) The most significant and troubling aspect of Montero, raising the stakes to the point where I felt compelled to communicate this interpretation, occurs near the end of the grinding scene. The character played by Lil Nas X rises upward and breaks Satan’s neck with one swift motion, presumably murdering him. Satan is so weak, he does not even try to resist. Lil Nas X then rips away Satan’s horns… and places them upon his own head.
3) Any form of art may, of course, be interpreted differently by individuals. My interpretation is that Lil Nas X, symbolized by the Presidential seal, represents the “Deep State.” The term “Deep State” terminology I use herein is a catch-all term. It implies any combination of broad groups, to possibly include: US government entities, corporate actors, people with influence and power in both traditional and social media, international elites, and spies for other unnamed countries. In other words, Lil Nas X represents the nameless and faceless entity which has the power to act against the will of the American people – and against the will of those who seek fair, democratic governance throughout the world. The positioning and actions of Satan in the video, combined with the setting for the speech in Philadelphia, suggests to me that Satan is analogous to President Biden.
(I am including the link for those who wish to see for themselves. The grinding scene comprises about the last minute of the video -for those who wish to skip ahead.)
This interpretation is troubling and provocative. It suggests that Biden is being controlled and manipulated by the “Deep State.” Furthermore, the video suggests that nominal leader of the free world is not only depicted as Satan but also has little true power. Rather, the Deep State runs the show.
Most ominously, if such an interpretation is correct, then it portends that the Deep State actors intend to murder President Biden once they deem him expendable. Then, the Deep State actors intend to install themselves as the all-powerful rulers of the US and the rest of the (presently) free world.
***
My interpretation could simply be a passing fancy, but for one possibility: What if the same group of people working with Roblox and others to choreograph the Montero video also influenced the set used by President Biden for his speech on 2 September? That would explain the similarity between the settings for Biden’s speech and the Montero video.
If this hypothesis is right, the similarity of the imagery of Biden and the Lil Nas X Montero video is not merely an accident but rather is intentional- and it is consistent with a psychological operation. Have “Deep State actors” foreshadowed their future plans for Biden in the Montero video?
Consider the possibility that Lil Nas X is an “active measure” in human form. In other words, Nas X may serve as the object of a dual Narrative. The first is used by some liberal media outlets to thwart Conservatives by suggesting Lil Nas X should be admired. Taylor Swift’s song, “You Need to Calm Down” illustrates the way the Lil Nas X Narrative is used to suppress concerns from traditional conservatives who are appalled at the rampant Satanic imagery used by Lil Nas X. In this Narrative form, Conservatives may be shamed as racist and homophobic – even if their main objection is to the “Satan Shoes” he promotes.
A second Narrative is delivered for the GOP elite (GOPe) who support the wealthy class in the US rather than “typical Trump voters” (MAGA). GOPe-focused candidates and media outlets can use Lil Nas X as a punching bag and discuss their support of “traditional values” without solving any real problems for their constituents. For example, the GOPe commonly support restrictions applied by corporations or universities due to Covid vaccination status. A lot of money has flowed from the pharmaceutical industry into their campaigns. Has any of that Big Pharma cash also made its way into the pockets of GOPe family members? It much easier for the GOPe candidates and media to place focus on their opposition to Lil Nas X’s tweets than it is to challenge Big Pharma.
With respect to Lil Nas X, there are even alleged older Tweets from 2015 (I will not post those rumors here) which suggest Lil Nax X was sexually attracted to his 3-year-old nephew. Think about it – how many teenagers are attracted to 3-year-olds? This entire script - that, apparently, many people expect us to believe- is just plain stupid.
Isn’t it much more likely that Lil Nas X is simply being compensated to play a role - for money and fame? Is Lil Nas X even gay? If I am right, the people who recruited Lil Nas X and who run his social media and marketing operation are clearly evil. But I am skeptical that they actually hold any beliefs specific to the Satanic material in the videos they promote. Those are more likely planted (1) to upset traditional Christians and (2) to dissuade the portion of the population who immediately dismiss anything labeled “Satanic” as being an over-reaction by Christian conservatives (with whom they may disagree on other issues). In other words: Divide and Conquer.
So as an interim summary, let’s reflect that, so far, this article has:
1) Highlighted the role that a study primarily funded by Roblox CEO David Baszucki played in suppressing the use of HCQ for early treatment of Covid-19. Within one year of funding the study, Baszucki “joined the billionaires club” as children were prevented from playing together outdoors due to lockdowns. Those lockdowns were supported by, among others, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. The Pelosi family, in turn, were given the privilege of purchasing Roblox stock at the initial public offering, and its stock priced soared by 55% on its first day on the stock market.
2) Emphasized the importance of being skeptical when considering what appear to philanthropic grants supporting new medical procedures and products – but which also have the potential to be very lucrative for the philanthropist. Similarly, the example of Theranos demonstrates how easy it is to deceive even highly respected political leaders with flashy marketing. If CAR T therapy turns out to be the next “big thing” in the pharmaceutial industry supported by those in power, be wary.
3) Noted the possibility that Deep State actors associated with tech firms, specifically Roblox, might have staged President Biden’s speech to resemble the Montero (Call Me by your name) video in order with the intention of drawing a comparison of Biden to Satan and to depict the egregious actions of the “Deep State” actors using Lil Nas X himself.
4) Postulated that the use and rapid emergence of Lil Nas X in US pop culture is consistent with that of an active measure. In other words, his handlers have ulterior motives designed to harm the United States.
5)If the foregoing interpretation is correct, then President Biden’s life has been threatened by the Deep State actors who produced the Montero video and/or staged the lighting and setting for his speech in Philadelphia.
***
Normally, that would be enough ground to cover in just one article. But I believe there is yet another *very* important possible aspect of an active measure personified by Lil Nas X to be considered. And with what I’m about to write next, you might say, “I’m about to change what you call range”:
I believe George Floyd was an innocent man.
My sense is that Lil Nas X’s portrayal as a cartoonish metaphor for evil is a proxy used by the “Deep State actors” to prevent Trump voters, and especially White Trump voters, from empathizing with George Floyd. Furthermore, I believe George Floyd truly was an innocent man - murdered by “a very large, powerful, and well organized group of people.” I believe George Floyd did NOT take the drug fentanyl of his own volition. Rather, I believe George Floyd was poisoned with fentanyl. And I believe he was subsequently choked to death by disgraced former Minneapolis police officers Lane, Thao, Kueng, and Chauvin.
Killing George Floyd in front of a world-wide audience served to demoralize the United States during a time of crisis. My opinion is that the ultimate goal of this “very, large, powerful, and well-organized group” was to impose a Color Revolution upon the United States - a required step to pave the way to a totalitarian-style world government.
To be clear, if I am right, Chauvin -and the other officers involved in George Floyd’s death- committed premeditated first-degree murder.
I am not providing any information to support my opinion - for now. But I will. That is a story for another time.
I agree with you that something profoundly evil has it's hands on the steering wheel in the USA, Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
The darkness we have watched rise is stunning. Your analysis of the imagery and possible meaning of the bizarre and satanic scenes in our news and entertainment make sense to me, but what it is intended for is another story.
Provocative? Fore shadowing? Just showing off?
Who knows, but it is certainly unsettling, and given what we have seen in the past two+ years it appears having a relationship with God and developing Spiritual Strength looks like a neccessary plan for us!
Dark forces took control of our governments, our hospitals, our media, big tech, pharma, too many of our courts and too many individuals as well.
Time to wake up and join together, those of us who belive in Justice, and Accountability for the guilty, as well Compassion and Healing for the Injured and Grieving.
So much collusion! So many wicked plans!
The Good among us must step up, together, to stop this agenda. And God help the little children raised on a diet of Satanism, Violence, and Pornography.
I am heart sick that our nation has come to this.
Great research!
Steve Kirsch supporting the Hydroxichlorquine trial would suggest it could have been supported in good faith, too. Maybe there was a difference in the way they related? (Like Baszucki influencing the trial procedures or him having previous knowledge the trial was a "hit job"?)